References

1. 1. Nakata K., Fujishima A. TiO2 photocatalysis: Design and applications // J. Photochem. Photobiol. C. 2012. V. 13. № 3. P. 169–189. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001
2. 2. Li Z., Wang S., Wu J., Zhou W. Recent progress in defective TiO2 photocatalysts for energy and environmental applications // Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2022. V. 156. ID 111980. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111980
3. 3. Wang C., Liu H. L, Qu Y. TiO2‐based photocatalytic process for purification of polluted water: bridging fundamentals to applications // J. Nanomater. 2013. V. 2013. № 1. ID 319637. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/319637
4. 4. Belver C., Bedia J., Gómez-Avilés A., Peñas-Garzón M., Rodriguez J.J. Semiconductor photocatalysis for water purification // Nanoscale Materials in Water Purification. 2019. P. 581–651. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00028-8
5. 5. Gołąbiewska A., Malankowska A., Jarek M., Lisowski W., Nowaczyk G., Jurga S., Zaleska-Medynska A. The effect of gold shape and size on the properties and visible light-induced photoactivity of Au-TiO2 // Appl. Catal., B. 2016. V. 196. P. 27–40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.013
6. 6. Su R., Tiruvalam R., He Q., Dimitratos N., Kesavan L., Hammond C., Lopez-Sanchez J.A., Bechstein R., Kiely C.J., Hutchings G.J., Besenbacher F. Promotion of phenol photodecomposition over TiO2 using Au, Pd, and Au–Pd nanoparticles // ACS Nano. 2012. V. 6. № 7. P. 6284–6292. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nn301718v
7. 7. Jin C., Dai Y., Wei W., Ma X., Li M., Huang B. Effects of single metal atom (Pt, Pd, Rh and Ru) adsorption on the photocatalytic properties of anatase TiO2 // Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017. V. 426. P. 639–646. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.065
8. 8. Naranov E.R., Sadovnikov A.A., Arapova O.V., Bugaev A.L., Usoltsev O.A., Gorbunov D.N., Russo V., Murzin D.Y., Maximov A.L. Mechanistic insights on Ru nanoparticle in situ formation during hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived substances to hydrocarbons // Catal. Sci. Technol. The Royal Soc. of Chemistry, 2023. V. 13. № 5. P. 1571–1583. https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2CY01127A
9. 9. Tian J., Li J., Wei N., Xu X., Cui H., Liu H. Ru nanoparticles decorated TiO2 nanobelts: A heterostructure towards enhanced photocatalytic activity and gas-phase selective oxidation of benzyl alcohol // Ceram. Int. 2016. V. 42. № 1. P. 1611–1617. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.09.112
10. 10. Shen X., Garces L.-J., Ding Y., Laubernds K., Zerger R.P., Aindow M., Neth E.J., Suib S.L. Behavior of H2 chemisorption on Ru/TiO2 surface and its application in evaluation of Ru particle sizes compared with TEM and XRD analyses // Appl. Catal., A. 2008. V. 335. № 2. P. 187–195. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.11.017
11. 11. Zhang Y., Su X., Li L., Qi H., Yang C., Liu W., Pan X., Liu X., Yang X., Huang Y., Zhang T. Ru/TiO2 catalysts with size-dependent metal/support interaction for tunable reactivity in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis // ACS Catal. 2020. V. 10. № 21. P. 12967–12975. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02780
12. 12. Zaera F. Nanostructured materials for applications in heterogeneous catalysis // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013. V. 42. № 7. P. 2746–2762. https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35261C
13. 13. Anisimov A.A., Minyaylo E.O., Shakirova A.R., Shchegolikhina O.I. Evolution of organometallasiloxanes // Polym. Sci. Ser. C. 2023. V. 65. № 2. P. 230–258. https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S181123822370042X
14. 14. Levitsky M.M., Yalymov A.I., Kulakova A.N., Petrov А.А., Bilyachenko А.N. Cage-like metallasilsesquioxanes in catalysis: A review // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2017. V. 426. P. 297–304. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.06.016
15. 15. Ребров Е.А., Музафаров А.М., Жданов А.А. Натрийоксиорганоалкоксисиланы — реагенты для направленного синтеза функциональных органосилоксанов // ДАН. 1988. V. 302. № 2. P. 346.
16. 16. Tebeneva N.A., Meshkov I.B., Тarasenkov А.N., Polshchikova N.V., Кalinina A.A., Buzin M.I., Serenko О.А., Zubavichus Y.V., Katsoulis D.E., Мuzafarov А.М. Polyfunctional branched metallosiloxane oligomers and composites based on them // J. Organomet. Chem. 2018. V. 868. P. 112–121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2018.04.011
17. 17. Tarasenkov A.N., Parshina M.S., Tebeneva N.A., Borisov K.M., Goncharuk G.P., Shevchenko V.G., Ponomarenko S.A., Muzafaro A.M. Metalloalkoxysiloxanes-cured polydimethylsiloxane compositions filled with silica component for special applications: dielectric and mechanical properties // Express Polym. Lett. 2022. V. 16. № 8. P. 846–870. https://dx.doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2022.62
18. 18. Parshina M.S., Tarasenkov A.N., Aysin R.R., Tebeneva N.A., Buzin M.I., Afanasyev E.S., Serenko O.A, Muzafarov A.M. Monitoring the curing processes of epoxy oligomers with partially substituted polyethoxymetallosiloxanes by IR spectroscopy and thermomechanical analysis // J. of Applied Polymer Sci. 2021. V. 138. № 36. ID 50918. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/app.50918
19. 19. Andropova U.S., Tebeneva N.A., Serenko O.A., Tarasenkov A.N., Buzin M.I., Shaposhnikova V.V., Muzafarov A.M. Nanocomposites based on polyarylene ether ketones from sol–gel process: Characterizations and prospect applications // Mater. Des. 2018. V. 160. P. 1052–1058. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10.033
20. 20. Andropova U., Serenko O., Tebeneva N., Tarasenkov A., Buzin M., Afanasyev E., Sapozhnikov D., Bukalov S., Leites L., Aysin R., Polezhaev A., Naumkin A., Novikov L., Chernik V., Voronina E., Muzafarov A. Atomic oxygen erosion resistance of polyimides filled hybrid nanoparticles // Polym. Test. 2020. V. 84. ID 106404. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106404
21. 21. Elsalamony R.A., Mahmoud S.A. Preparation of nanostructured ruthenium doped titania for the photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol under visible light // Arabian J. of Chemistry. 2017. V. 10. № 2. P. 194–205. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.06.008
22. 22. Gong B., Wu P., Yang J., Peng X., Deng H., Yin G. Electrochemical and photocatalytic properties of Ru-doped TiO2 nanostructures for degradation of methyl orange dye // Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2021. V. 16. № 2. ID 21023. https://dx.doi.org/10.20964/2021.02.18
23. 23. Nguyen-Phan T.-D., Luo S., Vovchok D., Llorca J., Sallis S., Kattel S., Xu W., Piper L.F.J., Polyansky D.E., Senanayake S.D., Stacchiola D.J., Rodriguez J.A. Three-dimensional ruthenium-doped TiO2 sea urchins for enhanced visible-light-responsive H2 production // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016. V. 18. № 23. P. 15972–15979. https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6CP00472E.
24. 24. Senthilnanthan M., Ho D.P., Vigneswaran S., Ngo H.H., Shon H.K. Visible light responsive ruthenium-doped titanium dioxide for the removal of metsulfuron-methyl herbcide in aqueous phase // Separation and Purification Technology. 2010. V. 75. № 3. P. 415–419. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2010.05.019
25. 25. Sadovnikov A.A., Baranchikov A.E., Zubavichus Y.V., Ivanova O.S., Murzin V.Y., Kozik V.V., Ivanov V.K. Photocatalytically active fluorinated nano-titania synthesized by microwave-assisted hydrothermal treatment // J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2015. V. 303–304. P. 36–43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.01.010
26. 26. Sadovnikov A.A., Nechaev E.G., Beltiukov A.N., Gavrilov A.I., Makarevich A.M., Boytsova O.V. Titania mesocrystals: working surface in photocatalytic reactions // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 4. P. 460–467. https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621040197
27. 27. Zhou J., Gao Z., Xiang G., Zhai T., Liu Z., Zhao W., Liang X., Wang L. Interfacial compatibility critically controls Ru/TiO2 metal-support interaction modes in CO2 hydrogenation // Nat. Commun. 2022. V. 13. № 1. ID 327. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27910-4