References

1. 1. Maholland M.K. Reducing gasoline Sulphur with additives // Petrol. Technology Quarterly. 2004. V. 9, № 3. P. 71–75.
2. 2. Каминский Э.Ф. Глубокая переработка нефти: технологический и экологический аспекты. М.: Техника, 2001. 384 с.
3. 3. Letzsch W. Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) in petroleum refining // Handbook of Petroleum Processing. 2015. V. 1. P. 261–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14529-7_2
4. 4. Jiang R., Yu S., Zhou Y., Zhu T. Study on the relation between the Mn/Al mixed oxides composition and performance of FCC sulfur transfer agent // Catalysts. 2016. V. 6, № 2. ID20. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal6020020
5. 5. Corma A., Palomares A.E., Rey F., Márquez F. Simultaneous catalytic removal of SOx and NOx with hydrotalcite-derived mixed oxides containing copper, and their possibilities to be used in FCC units // J. Catal. 1997. V. 170, № 1. P. 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1997.1750
6. 6. Pi Z., Shen B., Zhao J., Liu J. CuO, CeO₂-modified Mg−Al spinel for removal of SO₂ from fluid catalytic cracking flue gas // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015. V. 54, № 43. P. 10622–10628. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02329
7. 7. Jae L.S., Jun H.K., Jung S.Y., Lee T.J., Ryu C.K., Kim J.C. Regenerable MgO-based SOx removal sorbents promoted with cerium and iron oxide in RFCC // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005. V. 44, № 26. P. 9973–9978. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050607u
8. 8. Jiang L., Wei M., Xu X., Lin Y., Lü Z., Song J., Duan X. SOx oxidation and adsorption by CeO₂/MgO: synergistic effect between CeO₂ and MgO in the fluid catalytic cracking process // Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011. V. 50, № 8. P. 4398–4404. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie102243y
9. 9. Pereira H.B., Polato C.M., Monteiro J.L.F., Henriques C.A. Mn/Mg/Al-spinels as catalysts for SOx abatement: Influence of CeO₂ incorporation and catalytic stability // Catal. Today. 2010. V. 149, № 3-4. P. 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.06.006
10. 10. Li B., Yuan S. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of TiMgAlCu mixed oxides as novel SOx removal catalysts // Ceram. Int. 2014. V. 21, № 5. P. 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1081/LFT-120017451
11. 11. Kang H.T., Lv K., Yuan S.L. Synthesis, characterization, and SO₂ removal capacity of MnMgAlFe mixed oxides derived from hydrotalcite-like compounds // Appl. Clay Sci. 2013. V. 72. P. 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2013.01.015
12. 12. Cantú M., López-Salinas E., Valente J.S., Montiel R. SOx removal by calcined MgAlFe hydrotalcite-like materials: Effect of the chemical composition and the cerium incorporation method // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005. V. 39, № 24. P. 9715–9720. https://doi.org/10.1021/es051305m
13. 13. Cheng W.P., Yu X.Y., Wang W.J., Liu L., Yang J.G., He M.Y. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of Cu/MgAlFe as novel transfer catalyst for SOx removal // Catal. Commun. 2008. V. 9, № 6. P. 1505–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2007.12.020
14. 14. Kong J., Jiang L., Huo Z., Xu X., Evans D.G., Song J., He M., Li Z., Wang Q., Yan L. Influence of the preparation process on the performance of three hydrotalcite-based De−SOx catalysts // Catal. Commun. 2013. V. 40. P. 59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.05.026
15. 15. Sanchez-Cantu M., Perez-Diaz L.M., Maubert A.M., Valente J.S. Dependence of chemical composition of calcined hydrotalcite-like compounds for SOx reduction // Catal. Today. 2010. V. 150, № 3-4. P. 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2009.09.010
16. 16. Polato C.M.S., Henriques C.A., Neto A.A., Monteiro J.L.F. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of CeO₂/Mg, Al-mixed oxides as catalysts for SOx removal // J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005. V. 241, № 1-2. P. 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2005.07.006
17. 17. Bhattacharyya A., Yoo J.S. Additives for the catalytic removal of fluid catalytic cracking unit flue gas pollutants // Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1993. V. 76. P. 531–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991 (08)63837-9
18. 18. Hirschberg E.H., Bertolacini R.J. Catalytic control of SOx emissions from fluid catalytic cracking units // Fluid Catalytic Cracking. 1988. P. 114–145. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1988-0375.ch008
19. 19. Scherzer J. Designing FCC catalysts with high-silica Y zeolites // Appl. Catal. 1991. V. 75, № 1. P. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-9834 (00)83119-X
20. 20. Magnabosco L.M. Principles of the SOx reduction technology in fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCUs) // Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 2007. V. 166. P. 254–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2991 (07)80199-6
21. 21. Evans D.G., Duan X. Preparation of layered double hydroxides and their applications as additives in polymers, as precursors to magnetic materials and in biology and medicine // Chem. Commun. 2006. V. 37, № 5. P. 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1039/b510313b
22. 22. Oh J., Hwang S., Choy J. The effect of synthetic conditions on tailoring the size of hydrotalcite particles // Solid State Ionics. 2002. V. 151, № 1-4. P. 285–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738 (02)00725-7
23. 23. Saber O., Hatano B., Tagaya H. Preparation of new layered double hydroxide, Co-TiLDH // J. Ind. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 2005. V. 51. P. 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-004-4819-5
24. 24. Costantino U., Marmottini F., Nocchetti M., Vivani R. New synthetic routes to hydrotalcite-like compounds — characterisation and properties of the obtained materials // Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 1998. V. 1998, № 10. P. 1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1099-0682(199810)1998:103.0.CO;2-1
25. 25. Zeng H., Deng X., Wang Y., Liao K. Preparation of Mg−Al hydrotalcite by urea method and its catalytic activity for transesterification // AIChE J. 2009. V. 55, № 5. P. 1229–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11722
26. 26. Rao M.M., Reddy B.R., Jayalakshmi M., Jaya V.S., Sridhar B. Hydrothermal synthesis of Mg−Al hydrotalcites by urea hydrolysis // Materials Research Bulletin. 2005. V. 40, № 2. P. 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.10.007
27. 27. Абызов А.М. Измерение удельной поверхности дисперсных материалов методом низкотемпературной адсорбции газа: Практикум. СПб.: СПбГТИ(ТУ), 2016. 37 с.